IS HAMLIN DOOMED?(See Correction below)Not far west of Hamlin is a gigantic mixed-income housing tract on Route 31A in Holley. It is a vast project of “double-wides,” and it has proven to be a disaster for the Town.
Local officials are loath to talk about it because the agricultural land sold to the developer came from some of the Town’s most prestigious farms. Although the community was promised that the housing project would benefit them, the reverse has happened.
Many of the inhabitants of these "estates" gobble up services while returning practically nothing in tax relief. According to a knowledgeable source the Holley school district now has the highest concentration of “special needs” students, per capita, in New York State. Because the project offers such cheap entry level housing it has become a magnet for broken families, prisoner families, and cohabitation of convenience.
Hamlin may be facing a similar project but our Zoning and Planning Boards don’t see it.Last month the Planning Board gave preliminary approval to a proposal to build 70 houses adjacent to, and south of, Lake Breeze.
What makes this plan such a potential disaster is that the developer wants .3 acre lots. POINT THREE ACRE! Right now, under Hamlin Zoning Code, the smallest permissible lot size is .4 acres in a Residential-High Density district!
The builder wants
lot sizes smaller than those in Huntington Park.
What kind of houses could those possibly be?
The
Planning Board, as it normally does,
ducked any serious inquiry into the validity of the plan. Instead, as it normally does, handed it off to the Zoning Board for their decision on a variance.
The courageous folks on
the Planning Board, always diligent to protecting Hamlin from undesirable development, once again
hid behind the skirts of Norm Baas and the horrifically incompetent Zoning Board. To Baas’s credit, he promptly held a joint “workshop” with the ZBA, the PB and a few members of the advisory Conservation Board.
Only Dave Rose from the Town Board showed up to listen.Unfortunately for Hamlin property owners the workshop produced absolutely nothing. Nothing but the
inevitable head-shaking of Baas and his predictably vague but dire warnings about being sued by the developer if he is denied.
NOTHING people! Just a prolonged conversation about the punishing effects of small lot sizes on the Zoning Board! The entire conversation seemed to revolve around how the ZB was going to have to spend the next few years granting set-back variances for these new homeowners to put in pools and decks.
As usual, it was all about them!
This meeting, which held promise for finding a way to kill this bad idea, collapsed into a muddle of whining about how much work it would be for the Zoning Board! What a bunch!
This is important to note: not one person, not a single appointed or elected official who attended the workshop questioned whether the proposed development was good for Hamlin!
Not one.No one asked if the project fit into the Comprehensive Plan. No one asked the essential philosophical question of this community:
“DO WE NEED ANYMORE HOUSING PROJECTS?” Nobody asked if the proposal was “in conformance” with the dominant philosophy of the existing property owners in Hamlin which is- “
NO MORE DEVELOPMENT!”
Why didn’t they ask?
The answer is simple.
They don’t think like that. They are conditioned to look at every project like it has a RIGHT to be built.
Norm Baas espouses an antiquated, cock-eyed, pseudo-Libertarian notion that if you own land you are entitled to exploit it any way you want.Sorry Norm. That idea was swept away with the first zoning law at the turn of the century!
The 19th century!Zoning laws exist to protect taxpayers from having the value of their property destroyed by the self-interests of another property owner. What the ZBA and the PB of Hamlin can’t fathom is that
access to money, the ability to buy a big chunk of land and make a deal with a builder,
doesn’t grant a developer more rights then the surrounding landowners.They just don’t get it.
They don’t understand that they are responsible to the EXISTING PROPERTY OWNERS more than FUTURE ones.
The citizens of Hamlin want Hamlin to stay rural.
Local government just can’t or won’t hear that message.
But local residents don’t know how to help themselves. They just keep supporting the status quo.
Keep voting Republican everybody.
Make sure Norm sticks around for another 25 years.============================================
Correction: The Blog originally identified the nearby development as being in Albion. This was an error. It is located in Holley and the impact to taxpayers is on the Holley school district. The Blog aplogizes for any confusion.
Below is a letter from a concerned reader abou this issue. The author's name has been withheld and slight changes made to protect the author's identity.
* * *
Dear Pete,
I have just read your latest posting on the Blog, and I have a few comments to make.
First of all, let me tell you that my husband and I resided in Hamlin for 20+ years, in the Huntington Park subdivision, and I worked for the Town for (some) of those years. Yes, I am a Republican, and yet I don't always agree with my party. I vote the person, not the party. This is not what I'm writing about.
I know that you don't like criticism, as evidenced in your reply to M. Depew posted 8/22/05 in which you state that you "don't give a damn" about other opinions, but I'm going to give it a shot anyway.
My husband and I now live in ------ Estates West. We moved here 2 years ago. Here are the true facts:
1. ------ Estates West is located on route 31A, not route 31
2. The children attend Holley schools, not Albion.
3. Our lot is bigger than the one we had in Ryan Homes.
4. Our park is 3 miles west of Brockport in the Town of Clarendon.
5. Our homes start at 70M to over 100M. Do you consider this low income?
6. Could you be referring to Oak Orchard Estates outside of Albion, instead of ------ Estates West?
I fully agree with you that the lots in the Ryan Homes tract are very, very small, and I wouldn't want to go to a smaller lot than that either. That is one reason we moved from Hamlin to ------ Estates. I would like to invite you to come to my home any time (my husband and I are now retired) and see for yourself the size of our lot and the caliber of our manufactured home.
If, as I believe, you just had the wrong name on your Blog piece, I am asking you to correct it so that the people reading your editorials won't think we moved to a slum.
We'll be looking for you at our home. We are on the north side of route 31A. Stay on the road you come in on and our number is ---.
Thank you for considering this email.
Sincerely,
M--
* * *
Comment- It is never the intention of The Blog to harm residents or taxpayers. Unfortunately, sometimes this happens as an indirect result of a story. This is one such occasion.
The Blog has learned that there is a range of housing types and prices in this development. There are "upscale" homes and there are other less desirable ones.
No one can control who their neighbors are. Sometimes they start out good, then turn bad. However, the nature of this huge housing project has allowed many families who are in need of special services to concentrate there.
It is The Blog's opinion that every community has an obligation to provide a per-centage of low income housing. However, in an uncontrolled setting that per-centage can tip the scales of the property values for the entire community.
If a large burden of consumers who cannot pay their share of taxes is shifted onto the backs of the remaining property owners, then these owners move away. A cycle of decline begins.
Any community which does not monitor and regulate itself may be open to such shifts and the inevitable declines it produces. That is why the example of this housing tract was used as an example.
The Blog had no intention to condemn by association all the people who live there.
ED